Peer Review Process

 

The submitted paper must consider the journal template and must be written in english. Every paper will be subject to a review process with the following criteria:

  1. The submitted paper will be initially reviewed by the Editorial Board in order to be selected and sent to the reviewers for a double-blind peer-reviewed process. The paper should conform to the author’s guidelines and other basic requirements in order to avoid the delay for the next step, i.e. review process.
  2. Every manuscript submitted will check the originality of its contribution to the field as well as the reliability of theoretical methodologies and concepts in accordance with the topic and analysis. The review process will consider novelty, objectivity, methods, scientific impact, conclusions, and references. The reviewers will give four decisions (Accepted, Accepted with minor corrections, Accepted with major corrections, and Rejected).
  3. The accepted papers will be returned to the corresponding authors in order to be revised with duration by considering the reviewer's comments. If the author(s) are unable to make the required changes, the manuscript will be rejected.
  4. All manuscripts should have a low level of similarity to other sources to avoid plagiarism case when the paper is published. Therefore, all authors are suggested to use plagiarism detection software (Turnitin, Ithenticate, etc.) to perform similarity checks on their articles before submitting.
  5. The final manuscript must be submitted to OJS before the publication deadline.